<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Team Foundation Server Installation Woes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secondstanza.com/2008/03/08/team-foundation-server-installation-woes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secondstanza.com/2008/03/08/team-foundation-server-installation-woes/</link>
	<description>Application Development Musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:02:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crathjen</title>
		<link>http://secondstanza.com/2008/03/08/team-foundation-server-installation-woes/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crathjen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secondstanza.wordpress.com/?p=27#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m one of the testers for TFS setup. If it&#039;s any consolation, you definitely *should not* have had to modify the RS app pool in the way you described - that&#039;s pretty clearly MOSS stepping on RS&#039;s toes (or perhaps vice versa).

We&#039;ll take a look at this scenario internally and see what we can do to improve. We&#039;ve tested with MOSS but *usually* with MOSS on a remote machine. I was fairly certain that we&#039;d tested at least a few times with MOSS on the AT, but your experience suggests otherwise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of the testers for TFS setup. If it&#8217;s any consolation, you definitely *should not* have had to modify the RS app pool in the way you described &#8211; that&#8217;s pretty clearly MOSS stepping on RS&#8217;s toes (or perhaps vice versa).</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll take a look at this scenario internally and see what we can do to improve. We&#8217;ve tested with MOSS but *usually* with MOSS on a remote machine. I was fairly certain that we&#8217;d tested at least a few times with MOSS on the AT, but your experience suggests otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

